Friday, June 27, 2014

Should blogging be a reason for denial of benefits?




Dear Social Security Tribunal:

I have been pondering about your idea -that because i can blog about my claim, email, and fax letters, it is going to be assumed that I can work doing these things.

If I could, I would, is there such a job for me?
Lol my resume can also include that I can Facebook and Twitter.

Seriously, and most importantly should blogging be a reason for denial of benefits?

As you know after the fatal crash I have acquired a gift of writing. It may take days or even weeks for me to write as I mix up letters of the alphabet because of the crash. In my medical-legal-insurance case file you will find these results during medical testing. This writing obsession gives me a avenue to release my frustrations with the unfair, one sided, corrupt, insurance systems. It has been my only justice since the fatal crash -when an 18 year old slammed into me with his head-on with his car at 102km per hour, with the airbag going off in the side of my head, rolling 8 times, hitting a tree, and trapped upside down in the twisted wreck.

Regarding comments made in their denial letter by Service Canada about a laptop I have the following:
The Medical rehabilitation testing that I went threw suggested that I be trained and provided a laptop computer. My insurer concurred. These things are in my medical-legal-insurance case file and were provided to you (free of charge). Both training and the laptop were never provided. Service Canada has used the laptop for an excuse to justify denial of benefits. It is unwarranted. As you know by my previous writing similarly I was also not provided with a tractor. Service Canada it seems can just say what ever the hell they want to in their denial letters.

When I enquired about the laptop and training that was granted by my insurer I was told “you snooze you loose”. I was dismayed by what I was told, another words fuckyou. But they did provide there preferred wordhirlings almost $100,000 to write bogus paper trails for their agenda of not paying benefits.
I have been made to suffer with the abuses of the insurance world for 7 years now without losing my family or the stress killing me. 7 years of denials, interrogations, surveillance, doctors, and lawyers. 7 years of intentional deceptive acts by the insurance world. 7 years of this shit. Wouldn’t you be kinda pissed off too, and want to fix things?

I understand the consequences of going public and that I may not ever be granted CPP Disability Benefits because I pissed you off. But there is more at stake here. Familys are living in financial hell. A lot of people like myself that have been made to live this way by these unjust denials by the insurance systems.

10,000 cases of appeals at the Social Security Tribunal in limbo! Please know that I do understand the concept of people creating there own work to keep them in a job. But all these backlogs by FSCO and the Social Security Tribunal, for years, unjust denials against sick and injured victims, really? What does that say as a society that the most vulnerable in our society are being treated in this manner? Is there no shame in what your office is doing? Victims are losing everything because of these denial processes. Who is running this nut house you call the Social Security Tribunal?

For your viewing I have included a link to my new blog SSTRC.
I called it “ The Social Security Tribunal Research Centre” it is dedicated to providing information to the public about your office. It can be found at http://sstrc.blogspot.ca/ .

At this point you may be wondering about my confrontational position since we spoke on the phone.
To clarify, I stumbled upon a blog called CPP Disability Claims Advocate located at www.dcac.ca/blog. It is very informative . To put it mildly it showed me that you have not been forthcoming. Do you have anything to tell me after you read this blog of Social Security Tribunal horrors?

This claims process should not be debilitating to injured victims, I have enough problems with injurys I sustained in the crash that was not my fault, can you really blame me for becoming an advocate for change? I will re-establish communications with media sources and establish communications with new media sources. I will write, blog, publish, fax, email, and further piss you off. Sorry - I think you are an ok person in a bad situation (less the $91,800 - $231,500 a year salary you receive).


In accordance with the Access to Information and Privacy Act, applicants have the right to formally request a copy of their CPP Disability file, including the medical reports and supporting documents.

I FORMALLY REQUEST A COPY OF MY CPP DISABILITY FILE AS OF THE DATE OF THIS DOCUMENT

I FORMALLY REQUEST a PRE-HEARING prior to a Ministerial Enquiry.

I kindly ask you to please not allow Service Canada to continue treating my claim for benefit maliciously. Have they still not sent my file to you? Please poll them for their intentions and expedite this scripted fiasco. My list of important documents should be everything that I have sent you so far, including faxes and emails. I still require your office to acknowledge receipt. Everything I sent you is relevant.




You have enough medical evidence I sent you to make a reasonable decision in my claim and anyone with any common sense just looking at the newspaper articles and crash pictures should give you some inclination as to how fatal the crash was that caused my disabilitys. Service Canada refused to look or acknowledge the newspaper articles and crash pictures I sent them, and your office has done the same. What kind of investigation is it not to even look at the pictures of the crash that cause my disabilitys?

Please put an end to these bullshit denials I am bitter, fedup, pissed off, and now feel that my claim is hopeless. Does this government want all the disabled on welfare? Evidence so far suggests that it wont matter if I stop advocating right now anyway, it won't change what is going to happen to my claim at the end of the day. But I will get louder and louder the longer this takes in hopes that someone fix this process for the victims. We deserve better than victim abuse limbo and financial hardship.

I feel that I survived the crash and have been given this gift of writing for a reason. That reason is to expose my journey threw the insurance system and go public with my findings. Perhaps My writing can help others to endure the abuses of the insurance systems for we are the people that pay into these mandatory systems for many decades and deserve to be acknowledged, helped, and properly without delay given the tools to try to recover as best we can.

Looking forward to hearing from you in this regard as soon as possible. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Mr. xxxx xxxxxx

Crash Victim 2007 -
Insurance Victim – 2014






Cc: undisclosed

Tuesday, June 24, 2014

Appeal process for CPP disability benefits is a 'David and Goliath' battle, Sask. advocate says

Federal appeals tribunal has backlog of 7,000 cases

CBC News Posted: Jun 18, 2014 5:30 AM CT Last Updated: Jun 18, 2014 5:30 AM CT


A Saskatchewan woman who helps people apply for benefits under the Canada Pension Plan says the federal government's appeal process is a "David and Goliath" battle.
'The CPP, or the federal government, has all of the resources and the person making the application — who has the disability — has probably minimal.'- Disability claims advocate Allison Schmidt
Allison Schmidt, a Regina-based disability advocate with about 200 clients, is currently working with Suzanne Fincaryk, who has been waiting nearly two years for her appeal to be heard.
"They really make you run through a lot of hoops, which I can understand because they don't want to make it easy for everybody," Fincaryk told CBC News in a recent interview. "But it's ridiculous. It's gone beyond making it difficult."
Fincaryk lives in Preeceville, Sask., having moved there to be closer to family after suffering a serious heart attack, her second in ten years,  that left her with some cognitive impairment. Unable to work, she applied for disability benefits through the Canada Pension Plan.
allison schmidt
Allison Schmidt, who provides an advocacy service for disability claims, has about 200 clients. (CBC)
When that was refused she appealed, but her case is stalled in federal bureaucracy.
Schmidt says the situation facing Fincaryk, and many other clients, is not fair.
"It's almost like David and Goliath," Schmidt said. "The CPP, or the federal government, has all of the resources and the person making the application — who has the disability — has probably minimal [resources]."
Schmidt says few people have the money to produce medical reports or finance independent assessments to support their claims.

Backlog of 7,000 cases

What's more, according to information Schmidt received by filing an Access to Information request, there is a major backlog facing the Social Security Tribunal, which reviews denied claims.
She learned there are about 7,000 cases waiting to be heard by a tribunal. And, according to Schmidt, the tribunal has only 35 adjudicators assigned to disability files.

No immediate response from Social Security Tribunal

CBC News contacted the tribunal who said they would not be able to respond to an interview request right away.
Schmidt says she has had one client die while waiting on an appeal. Others exhaust all their savings.
"While they're waiting sometimes they have to go on to social services and that is very difficult for them," Schmidt said. "But people can't sustain themselves financially for years at a time. They end up using all their retirement savings or using all their personal savings just to make the bills."
While Fincaryk waits, and hopes, she is getting by with support from her parents and a provincial benefit program.
Schmidt says, in her experience, officials routinely turn down about 60 per cent of cases at every stage — from the initial application through to an appeal before the Social Security Tribunal.
Her advice, for people seeking a disability benefit, is to pay close attention to the initial application to ensure it has all the information the government wants and all the documents needed to support a claim.

source:  http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/appeal-process-for-cpp-disability-benefits-is-a-david-and-goliath-battle-sask-advocate-says-1.2679174

Thousands denied federal disability benefits waiting more than a year for appeals

Thousands of Canadians who have been denied federal disability benefits have been waiting more than a year to have their appeals heard by the federal government’s new Social Security Tribunal, which is clearing just a small fraction of the cases every month.

Allison Schmidt, a Regina-based consultant who helps sick and injured people appeal decisions of the Canada Pension Plan disabilities program, says one of her clients died before her hearing could be scheduled, and many others are declaring bankruptcy.
 
“It’s not a welfare program. These people paid into it,” Ms. Schmidt said of CPP disability benefits. The delays, she said, are a “disgrace.”
The federal Conservative government eliminated last year a board of more than 1,000 part-time referees who heard appeals of employment insurance, CPP and Old Age Security decisions. It was replaced on April 1, 2013, with the Social Security Tribunal, which has fewer than 70 full-time members – 35 of whom have been assigned to the income-security section, which includes CPP and OAS.

The tribunal inherited 7,224 appeals of income-security cases from its predecessor – most of them launched by people who were denied CPP disability benefits. There were also 3,741 new CPP and OAS appeals filed last year. But the tribunal heard just 348 income-security appeals in its first 13 months of operation. So, even though more than 700 cases were settled without a hearing, there are nearly 10,000 still waiting in the queue.

“If they keep going at this rate, and nobody else applies, it’s going to take them nine-and-a-half years to hear all of the current income-security appeals,” said Jinny Sims, NDP critic for employ- ment and social development.

Dominique Forget, the senior director of the tribunal, said adjudicators were hampered last year by a regulation that gave appellants and the government 365 days, starting April 1, 2013, to file documents and give notice that they were ready to proceed . That applied even to appeals that had been launched years earlier, Ms. Forget said.

In the first 12 months, “we didn’t have many cases where the parties told us they were ready to proceed,” she said.

The 365-day deadline on all of the inherited cases has now expired so all of those cases are being handed off to the adjudicators, explained Ms. Forget. She couldn’t say how many cases are being heard every month or predict how fast the tribunal will get through the backlog. But “if we jump in time and we go to April 2015,” she said, “I am sure the picture will look quite different.”

Ms. Schmidt is not optimistic. She said she doesn’t believe 35 people can clear a backlog of nearly 10,000 appeals.

“Some of these files are inches thick,” said Ms. Schmidt. “You’ve got complex medical information to review. Then you’ve got to apply the legislative tenets. Then you’ve got to have a hearing. And then you’ve got to write the decision.”

One of Ms. Schmidt’s clients suffered a stroke several years ago. He also has severe arthritis which makes it impossible to continue working as a welder and is depleting his retirement savings just to survive.

When his claim for CPP disability was rejected, he filed an appeal in July 2012. Ms. Schmidt said she told the tribunal last fall that the man is prepared to proceed with a hearing but has heard nothing.

Rodger Cuzner, the Liberal critic for Employment and Social Development, said the Social Security Tribunal is just “another example of how vulnerable Canadians end up paying for poorly planned and implemented programs. Everyone knew this was going to happen except the government.”

source: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/thousands-awaiting-appeals-before-social-security-tribunal/article19150798/

Freedom Of Information request reveals .......

On February 27, 2014 I requested information under the Freedom of Information Act regarding the Social Security Tribunal appeal statistics.

9027 Income Security Appeals are waiting to be heard (these are CPP appeals)

The SST heard 21 CPP appeals in 2013 and 155 appeals in 2014 in the General Division.

The SST heard 38 CPP appeals in 2013 and 40 appeals in 2014 in the Appeals Division.

As of February 2014 a total of 2,802 appeals were received at the Income Security Division of the SST which includes CPP and OAS appeals.

There are 292 Income Security Appeals waiting to be heard at the Appeal Division of the SST.

67 Appeals were heard in person, 82 appeals were by teleconference, 26 were by videoconference, 3 were by way of question and answers.

There were 592 appeals allowed and 134 appeals dismissed at the General Division (interesting because the SST only heard 176 appeals so most of these were CPP driven). http://www.dcac.ca/blog/?page=1


 Source: http://www.fairassociation.ca/category/news/

Monday, June 9, 2014

Has Service Canada work to rule affected my claim for CPP Disability Benefits?

Minister accuses EI union of working to rule

The number of jobless Canadians who managed to connect with an agent when they called Service Canada looking for their employment insurance cheques reached its lowest level in six years this fall.

Service Canada employees say the decline in staff size is the cause of the jammed phone lines – and the problems that many unemployed people are having in getting their benefits applications processed.

The number of jobless Canadians who managed to connect with an agent when they called Service Canada looking for their employment insurance cheques reached its lowest level in six years this fall.
Service Canada employees say the decline in staff size is the cause of the jammed phone lines – and the problems that many unemployed people are having in getting their benefits applications processed.

More related to this story

But Human Resources Minister Diane Finley suggests the workers in her agency are deliberately cutting back on service as part of a backlash against the changes being made by the Conservative government to automate the EI process.

In a letter to the Charlottetown Guardian dated Nov. 21, Ms. Finley says it is most interesting that “in the month that we announced we will be overhauling and improving EI processing to better serve Canadians – before any changes were introduced – productivity and performance went from being on par with last year's performance at this time, to the worst in five years.”

More than 1,000 processing agents have been let go since the spring. Ms. Finley says they were temporary employees hired specifically to deal with a balloon in EI claims during the recent recession.

But the Canada Employment and Immigration Union says the number of processing agents is now well below prerecession levels. And the union is furious that Ms. Finley would suggest there is a work-to-rule campaign going on.
“If service levels are the worst that they’ve been in five years, I can assure you, it is entirely because Service Canada was far too quick to cut positions on the premise that automation would compensate,” said Steve McCuaig, the union’s national executive vice-president.

Alyson Queen, a spokeswoman for Ms. Finley, said the Human Resources Department is engaged in a process of modernizing its systems that will ultimately allow for better, faster and more cost-effective service to Canadians.
But Mr. McCuaig said “there isn’t an automated system in the world that can process applications that are as complex as EI legislation is and as unique to the applicants and their circumstances.”

Meanwhile, statistics supplied by Ms. Finley to Rodger Cuzner, the Liberal human resources critics, show the decline in service at the department’s call centres has been going on for at least six years.

In 2005-06, 58 per cent of the calls about EI from across Canada actually made it through to an agent. By September of this year, that had dropped to 32 per cent.

And, in some regions, the drop was much more pronounced. In Edmonton, for instance, the successful calls fell from 91 per cent to 31 per cent over the six-year span. In Regina, they fell from 84 per cent to 26 per cent.
The department denies that it has failed to renew the contracts of temporary employees in the Service Canada call centres.

“Through normal attrition, 84 people have left the call centres since July of this year and we have not replaced those positions,” Ms. Queen said. “However, for the record, there have been no non-renewals of term contracts or terminations within the EI or [Canada Pension Plan]call centres as a result of financial pressures.”

The union representatives, however, says that is patently untrue and that hundreds of temporary call centre employees across the country have been told they are no longer needed. They point to grievances that have been filed by their members who were let go in September, and memos from managers telling employees that staff is being reduced as a result of monetary cutbacks.

source: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/minister-accuses-ei-union-of-working-to-rule/article542818/?from=549462 

NDP blasts dismal response rate as Tories cut EI call centres

With the Conservative government planning to downsize call centres that handle employment insurance claims, the New Democrats have obtained data to show that one in every four calls is being abandoned because callers can’t reach a representative.
Internal government documents released by the NDP at an Ottawa news conference Wednesday show that in larger cities like Winnipeg and Vancouver, nearly a third of the people who called Service Canada about EI last month eventually hung up because they could not speak to someone in a timely manner.

More related to this story

And in the final week of September, more than half of the people who called about the Canada Pension Plan and Old Age Security reached nothing but a busy signal.

“Folks on the other end of the line who depend on the service couldn’t even get through nearly 25 per cent of the time,” human resources critic Jean Crowder said. “So one out of every four people who call can’t talk to anyone about the problem they are having.”

Service Canada employees have received e-mails telling them that call centres in Vancouver, Montague, PEI, and the Nova Scotia communities of Glace Bay and Sydney will be reduced in size over the next three years.

Human Resources Minister Diane Finley has explained that the government hired extra employees on a temporary basis during the recession to handle the high volume of EI claims.

“Fortunately, thanks to our economic action plan, more Canadians are at work now than ever before, so there is not the same need to hire people to process the claims,” the minister said last month when asked about the downsizing at the call centres.

“The individuals knew that they were temporary jobs, but service standards have improved compared to the 10 weeks it took when the Liberals were in power,” Ms. Finley said.

She has also said Service Canada is moving away from a paper system to automated processes that will give workers more time to deal directly with the people they serve.

But Ms. Crowder said the automated system has been in place for five years and most people already try to file their claims on line.

“Less than 50 per cent of claims can be handled without an employee involved,” she said. “Even a tiny anomaly in a claim will be rejected by the automated system.”

Unemployed workers who need help but cannot get help by telephone will have to wait longer for the money they need to pay their bills, Ms. Crowder said.
The government, she added, “should reverse the decision to cut the staff at EI processing centres so Canadians are not left waiting for the benefits they deserve and need in these tough economic times.”

source:  http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/ndp-blasts-dismal-response-rate-as-tories-cut-ei-call-centres/article619007/

EI queue has ballooned since Service Canada staff cuts

Hundreds of thousands of unemployed Canadians are waiting for the federal government to process their claims for employment insurance – a queue that newly released documents show has doubled since 2007 as Services Canada reduces its staff.

In October of 2007, there were 181,931 people waiting for their claims to be processed, according to documents obtained by The Globe and Mail using federal Access to Information legislation. By October of this year, that number had climbed to 360,481 – and according to past seasonal trends, is likely to be higher now.

More related to this story

Growth in the waiting list for benefits parallels a decline in temporary and permanent staff in the processing centres, with numbers 13 per cent lower than in October, 2007. Hundreds of additional processing agents were hired during the economic downturn of 2008 and 2009 but those people, and others, have since been let go or left without being replaced.

The result has been a system in turmoil, as documented in a series of Globe stories over the past two months. Unemployed people are unable to get through by telephone to find out what is delaying their benefits. The newly released documents reveal wild fluctuations in temporary staff at Service Canada’s call centres where the phone lines as so jammed that just one in three calls is answered.

Many of the unemployed are turning up at Service Canada centres instead and are extremely frustrated. Service Canada workers in a number of cities are reporting receiving threats of violence.

One woman who waited for months for an answer is Lorena Delim, a health-care aide who went on maternity leave a year ago when her son was born. The baby died in August – a tragedy Ms. Delim cannot bring herself to discuss even four months later.

She immediately told Service Canada that the boy had passed away. Because of her fragile emotional state, she was advised to convert some of the remaining months of her maternity leave to disability leave.
Weeks later, she had received no cheque for the period after the baby’s death but she did get a letter from Service Canada telling her she had to pay back more than $500 in benefits.

Ms. Delim tried repeatedly to telephone a government agent to set things straight but could not get past the message machines. More than once she went into the local Service Canada centre in an attempt to resolve the issue. “They e-mailed for the processing centre to call me back but I never heard from them again,” she said in a telephone interview.

Ms. Delim eventually turned to Winnipeg’s Unemployed Help Centre to see if the staff there could get through to Service Canada on her behalf. In the week before Christmas – three weeks after she had returned to her job – she was finally told she would be getting benefits for September and October.
Although the number of people who, like Ms. Delim, are waiting has spiked in 2011, the 248,659 EI claims filed in October were about the same as in Octobers past, the documents obtained by The Globe show.

The documents did not give figures for November and December of 2011. But the records show that the number of Canadians waiting for their first benefits cheque annually jumps by as much as 100,000 during those months as a result of seasonal fluctuations. So the real number of unemployed Canadians currently waiting for their first EI payment could be approaching 500,000.

In response to questions from The Globe, the Human Resources Department said it works to “maintain a flexible and sustainable workforce capacity comprising both permanent and temporary employees, working on a full- or part-time basis.”

Human Resources Minister Diane Finley says fewer people are needed because her department is moving to a more automated system.
But Service Canada workers point out that the system became automated four years ago. And they say the depletion of their ranks means any claim that requires human intervention is taking additional weeks and even months to process.

“I liken this to a ticking time bomb,” says Neil Cohen, the executive director of the Community Unemployed Help Centre in Winnipeg.
“We have clients who are dealing with depression issues who have talked about suicide and those threats have to be taken seriously [as do]threats of violence against Service Canada workers,” Mr. Cohen said. “The federal government has just ignored the problem.”

 source: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ei-queue-has-ballooned-since-service-canada-staff-cuts/article4247846/

Service Canada employees told to keep mum on complaints office

There is an office within Service Canada where jobless people who have waited undue lengths of time for their first employment-insurance cheque can complain about the delay – but Service Canada employees are not permitted to tell them about it.
It’s called the Office of Client Satisfaction, and it promises to work to “resolve any issues brought to its attention.” But call centre agents who field questions about EI claims say they have been warned by their bosses not to mention its existence to the frustrated people on the other end of the line.

More related to this story

“The only way they are allowed to give information about it is if the client specifically says, ‘Do you have information about the Office of Client Satisfaction,’ ” said Steve McCuaig, the national vice-president of the Canada Employment and Immigration Union. “So how are they supposed to ask for something they don’t even know exists?”

It’s a bind that the agents find themselves in more often as the work force assigned to process claims shrinks to meet federal budget restraints, and the number of EI claims that take more than the maximum 28 days to be decided increases correspondingly.

Even though the jobless rate went up last month, Service Canada's work force is expected to decline even further as Human Resources and Skills Development Canada trims costs to meet deficit reduction targets. So the lines at Service Canada which are already jammed with anxious EI claimants are likely to get even busier.

Many of the angry claimants are turning to their local MP for help.
“Why should they have to call an MP when they've got me on the phone?” said one Service Canada call-centre agent. “I tell them we are late, but can’t take their complaint? Crazy. Who wouldn't go nuts at that? We deliver bad news but aren't accountable to it.”

Another agent, however, said there would be little point in directing someone whose benefits have been delayed to the Office of Client Satisfaction because that office can only turn to the same overworked processing agents who are fielding complaints forwarded by the call-centre staff.

Until July, those processing agents were required to return calls to people who had complaints about their claims within two days. That has been increased to five days because the agents could not keep up with the volume of calls. And Service Canada staff say even the five-day deadline is not being met.
The Human Resources Department was asked for basic information about the Office of Client Satisfaction on Tuesday, and to explain why call-centre agents could not divulge its existence to clients – but no responses were provided.
Jamus Dorey of Nova Scotia applied for employment insurance on July 24. His claim was not processed until Sept. 24, and he received his first EI cheque on Sept. 28.
“It went on and on and on,” he said. “I would call almost every second day for the full eight weeks and not one person from Service Canada actually called me back.”

Mr. Dorey found a job in October. But as the single father of a young son, he says he is very glad he had his own savings to get through two months with no income.

Throughout the days and weeks that he was trying to get answers out of Service Canada, no one told him about the Office of Client Satisfaction. It was the staff working for Rodger Cuzner, his Liberal MP who also happens to be the party’s critic for Human Resources, who told him there was an office within Service Canada where he could make a complaint.

Mr. Dorey said he called the Office of Client Satisfaction and was told someone would get back to him in a week. The claim was approved shortly thereafter, but he attributes the resolution to Mr. Cuzner’s intervention.

source: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/service-canada-employees-told-to-keep-mum-on-complaints-office/article542838/

Calls to EI complaints office skyrocket

The secretive Office for Client Satisfaction where jobless Canadians can launch complaints about the handling of their employment insurance claims is not so secret any more.

New documents released this week by the Conservative government show that the office received 9,488 “comments” between April 1 and Dec. 7 of last year.

More related to this story

That is a considerable increase from the period between 2007 and 2010 when the office averaged a little more than 3,000 comments a year. The number jumped to about 6,000 in fiscal year 2010-11 – an increase that Service Canada attributes to a higher volume of EI claims.
But, in the current fiscal year that ends on March 31, the office is on track to hear from more than 12,000 Canadians.

The volume of comments ballooned in November when The Globe and Mail published a story quoting Service Canada call-centre agents who said they have been warned by their bosses not to mention the office’s existence to jobless clients who are frustrated with the time it is taking to process their EI claims.
“Since November 2011, the extremely high volumes of client feedback have led to delays in processing some of the more complex files,” say the documents, which were provided in response to questions from Jean Crowder, the NDP human resources critic.

Ms. Crowder said she believes the increase in calls to the Office for Client Satisfaction (OCS) can be attributed to the fact that people are becoming aware of it. “And cuts to services are forcing people into looking for alternatives,” she said.

In response to questions about the recent spike, Service Canada said additional resources have been added to the OCS, and the department’s website “has been updated to encourage clients to direct their request to the appropriate program.”

Service Canada staff say they have been unable to keep up with the workload after hundreds of workers were cut last year.

Human Resources Minister Diane Finley recently authorized the temporary rehiring of more than 100 employees who had been laid off from the EI processing centres, as well as the reassignment of workers from other divisions within Service Canada, to deal with a rising mountain of claims.

In October, more than 360,000 people were waiting for their EI benefits to be processed, a backlog that has since grown, and some unemployed people are waiting months for their first cheque.

Frustrated claimants have jammed the phone lines at Service Canada call centres. But many of the agents who deal with those callers say they have been told not to tell them about the Office for Client Satisfaction.

Don Rogers, the national president of the Canadian Employment and Immigration Union, which represents call-centre agents and claims processors, said Service Canada workers in some parts of the country are allowed to give out the number for the OCS while workers in other regions are strongly dissuaded from doing so.

“But we have been encouraging folks, if they are not happy with the wait times, that the best thing to do is to register your unhappiness with the Office for Client Satisfaction,” he said. “That’s why it’s there.”

The documents provided to Ms. Crowder also show high levels of absenteeism among Service Canada staff, especially at the processing centres. While the average Canadian worker takes between seven and eight sick days a year, EI processing agents take an average of nearly 12.

Mr. Rogers said his members are experiencing high levels of stress and anxiety. “You can imagine when it takes a member of the public days to get through [on the telephone]with a query that they may be unhappy when they finally get through and speak with someone,” he said.

Ms. Crowder said she is hearing anecdotally from Service Canada employees about the difficult environment in which they work. “They are hearing people threatening suicide,” she said, “they are hearing threats of violence and all that kind of thing.”

source: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/calls-to-ei-complaints-office-skyrocket/article549462/


Tuesday, June 3, 2014

Social Security Tribunal - Unsecured Submission rules.


The Social Security Tribunal system revelled itself with a phone message from “Paul”.
Paul called to confirm receipt of my faxes -apparently they were receiving hundreds of blank pages and were concerned.

To help Paul I gave them my email address so I could send them my Open PGP secure email submissions instead of fax. Unfortunately that process did not work out well.
An email from David Burnside from the Social Security Tribunal said their firewall was preventing my submissions and they are not setup to accept submissions by secure email. They will also not accept documents from password protected cloud document share resources -for example Google Docs.
They will however accept unsecured email and unsecured attachments.

The process of sending documents to the Social Security Tribunal has many flaws ( file size limits, unsecured) and makes it unreasonably hard for a crash victim trying to submit documents relating to a Disability Benefits appeal. Knowone should be made to send personal medical information unsecured. This experience has educated me in the lack of security for sending personal medical information to the Social Security Tribunal. They should accept signed open PGP secure email, or make other arrangements to send and receive personal information securely. To be clear, the problem with my email submissions is on their end, not mine, ALL rules should be given to an appeal applicant upfront.

It would have made my appeal so much easier for everyone if the Social Security Tribunal acquired my insurance-legal-medical information directly from the sources ( Doctors, Lawyers, HCAI, hospitals, etc.) How do they expect a crash victim out of work since 2007 to acquire 600 confidential insurance-legal-medical pages from different sources free of charge?

It is nice to finally have an actual persons name from the Tribunal. My confidential insurance-legal-medical submissions were flowing uninterrupted by fax. Now that the Tribunal has these documents they need to confirm them. I have asked repeatedly for confirmation but to date have not received any.

I sent the contents of Canadian Insurance News to the Social Security Tribunal as it relates to comments made by Service Canada in their denial letter about me not doing “some kind of work”. The contents of the site shows that I do in fact “some kind of work” when I can.
The email contents of the site prompted a URGENT email response and telephone message from David Burnside from the Social Security Tribunal. Apparently he has restrictions as to what he can write in an email it would be considered protected B material. Seems so wrong that he can accept unsecured email from me but he has restrictions and cant provide me with confirmation of what medical documents I have sent him.

The David Burnside email was marked URGENT so I called him at the number in his email footer and was told by the Social Security Tribunal that I could ask for a direct number from David. I emailed David but he said he does not have a direct line to supply. Another example of confusion on their end.

Confirmation was an issue with my medical submissions with Service Canada and is now again with the Social Security Tribunal. When ever, or if ever, they finally confirm what they have received from me they still need to read my submissions. Given the history of my claim for CPP Disability Benefits being so blatantly ignored by Service Canada and passed on to the Tribunal , I seriously doubt they will even take the time.

At this writing David Burnside from the Social Security Tribunal asked for a phone number. I explained to him that unfortunately I do not have a phone, I do not have a cell phone, I do not have any income, I do not have a job, I have not worked since 2007. I am being financially supported by my common law spouse. She supports the 3 of us with her part time job.

If the Social Security Tribunal wants me to get a phone maybe they should grant my Appeal so that I can get one with my disability benefits that I am clearly entitled to.

The alternative is to simply give me a number to talk to someone. Come on Social Security Tribunal even Walmart has customer service!

Crash victim 2007, CPP Disability applicant since 2008.

Administrator,
Surviving a Collision,