In my years living
with my injuries I have found the following relevant information to
my Application for Canada Pension Plan Disability Benefits. And
relevant to my own understanding of my injuries.
I kindly ask that
the Member of the Social Security Tribunal assigned my case seriously
consider the following:
In the crash, my
cervical spine was over-expanded. But the whip stroke did not
happened in the exact nodding axis of the head.
If you collide with
an obstacle e.g. by car in a rather lateral way, or if cars collide
on a crossing, then it is absolutely possible that the whip stroke is
triggered a little displaced from the normal nodding axis and that it
includes a kind of head shaking.
So it is indeed
possible that twists also occur in the cervical spine. And not only
this: We know from the cervical spines anatomy that the cervical
spine has a network of ligaments and arteries. There is a joint
connection (head joint) between the Atlas (C1) and the Axis (C2).
This is the most flexible, but also the most unstable part of the
spinal column. The Dens is a kind of buttress and prevents the head
from over-flexion. All other movements like head shaking, nodding,
turning the head etc. are secured by the ligaments and capsules.
In my injury there
was a violent and not consciously controllable over-flexion of my
head that had occurred. That way it was possible that my head joint
consisting of Atlas and Axis was opened more than its anatomical
limits allow.
Add the fact that
the impact was at a hi rate of speed.
Add to that my head
was inside the steering wheel at the time of impact and airbag
detonation in a lateral way to my head.
Add to that the fact
that the vehicle I was driving rolled 8 times.
Add to that the
vehicle then hit a tree laterally.
Add to that the
vehicle hit the tree upside/down.
The 3 vehicles
involved were all completely right offs and one person died.
Its fair to say the
injuries regarding my neck, shoulder, head, spine, and nerves are
substantiated by the facts.
Its also fair to say
my general well being for the past 8 years has been harmed because of
broken insurance, justice, and health care systems, that are suppose
to be there when we need them.
All the things that
people only think they have.
I kindly ask that
the Social Security Tribunal not reject the obvious science. Without
the scientific method its just a set of opinions. By shaving,
eliminating, and ignoring the facts that don’t quite fit, the
continued hypothesis will consciously approach fraud.
Looking forward to
hearing from the Social Security Tribunal in this regard.
Thank you.
