Friday, June 27, 2014

Should blogging be a reason for denial of benefits?




Dear Social Security Tribunal:

I have been pondering about your idea -that because i can blog about my claim, email, and fax letters, it is going to be assumed that I can work doing these things.

If I could, I would, is there such a job for me?
Lol my resume can also include that I can Facebook and Twitter.

Seriously, and most importantly should blogging be a reason for denial of benefits?

As you know after the fatal crash I have acquired a gift of writing. It may take days or even weeks for me to write as I mix up letters of the alphabet because of the crash. In my medical-legal-insurance case file you will find these results during medical testing. This writing obsession gives me a avenue to release my frustrations with the unfair, one sided, corrupt, insurance systems. It has been my only justice since the fatal crash -when an 18 year old slammed into me with his head-on with his car at 102km per hour, with the airbag going off in the side of my head, rolling 8 times, hitting a tree, and trapped upside down in the twisted wreck.

Regarding comments made in their denial letter by Service Canada about a laptop I have the following:
The Medical rehabilitation testing that I went threw suggested that I be trained and provided a laptop computer. My insurer concurred. These things are in my medical-legal-insurance case file and were provided to you (free of charge). Both training and the laptop were never provided. Service Canada has used the laptop for an excuse to justify denial of benefits. It is unwarranted. As you know by my previous writing similarly I was also not provided with a tractor. Service Canada it seems can just say what ever the hell they want to in their denial letters.

When I enquired about the laptop and training that was granted by my insurer I was told “you snooze you loose”. I was dismayed by what I was told, another words fuckyou. But they did provide there preferred wordhirlings almost $100,000 to write bogus paper trails for their agenda of not paying benefits.
I have been made to suffer with the abuses of the insurance world for 7 years now without losing my family or the stress killing me. 7 years of denials, interrogations, surveillance, doctors, and lawyers. 7 years of intentional deceptive acts by the insurance world. 7 years of this shit. Wouldn’t you be kinda pissed off too, and want to fix things?

I understand the consequences of going public and that I may not ever be granted CPP Disability Benefits because I pissed you off. But there is more at stake here. Familys are living in financial hell. A lot of people like myself that have been made to live this way by these unjust denials by the insurance systems.

10,000 cases of appeals at the Social Security Tribunal in limbo! Please know that I do understand the concept of people creating there own work to keep them in a job. But all these backlogs by FSCO and the Social Security Tribunal, for years, unjust denials against sick and injured victims, really? What does that say as a society that the most vulnerable in our society are being treated in this manner? Is there no shame in what your office is doing? Victims are losing everything because of these denial processes. Who is running this nut house you call the Social Security Tribunal?

For your viewing I have included a link to my new blog SSTRC.
I called it “ The Social Security Tribunal Research Centre” it is dedicated to providing information to the public about your office. It can be found at http://sstrc.blogspot.ca/ .

At this point you may be wondering about my confrontational position since we spoke on the phone.
To clarify, I stumbled upon a blog called CPP Disability Claims Advocate located at www.dcac.ca/blog. It is very informative . To put it mildly it showed me that you have not been forthcoming. Do you have anything to tell me after you read this blog of Social Security Tribunal horrors?

This claims process should not be debilitating to injured victims, I have enough problems with injurys I sustained in the crash that was not my fault, can you really blame me for becoming an advocate for change? I will re-establish communications with media sources and establish communications with new media sources. I will write, blog, publish, fax, email, and further piss you off. Sorry - I think you are an ok person in a bad situation (less the $91,800 - $231,500 a year salary you receive).


In accordance with the Access to Information and Privacy Act, applicants have the right to formally request a copy of their CPP Disability file, including the medical reports and supporting documents.

I FORMALLY REQUEST A COPY OF MY CPP DISABILITY FILE AS OF THE DATE OF THIS DOCUMENT

I FORMALLY REQUEST a PRE-HEARING prior to a Ministerial Enquiry.

I kindly ask you to please not allow Service Canada to continue treating my claim for benefit maliciously. Have they still not sent my file to you? Please poll them for their intentions and expedite this scripted fiasco. My list of important documents should be everything that I have sent you so far, including faxes and emails. I still require your office to acknowledge receipt. Everything I sent you is relevant.




You have enough medical evidence I sent you to make a reasonable decision in my claim and anyone with any common sense just looking at the newspaper articles and crash pictures should give you some inclination as to how fatal the crash was that caused my disabilitys. Service Canada refused to look or acknowledge the newspaper articles and crash pictures I sent them, and your office has done the same. What kind of investigation is it not to even look at the pictures of the crash that cause my disabilitys?

Please put an end to these bullshit denials I am bitter, fedup, pissed off, and now feel that my claim is hopeless. Does this government want all the disabled on welfare? Evidence so far suggests that it wont matter if I stop advocating right now anyway, it won't change what is going to happen to my claim at the end of the day. But I will get louder and louder the longer this takes in hopes that someone fix this process for the victims. We deserve better than victim abuse limbo and financial hardship.

I feel that I survived the crash and have been given this gift of writing for a reason. That reason is to expose my journey threw the insurance system and go public with my findings. Perhaps My writing can help others to endure the abuses of the insurance systems for we are the people that pay into these mandatory systems for many decades and deserve to be acknowledged, helped, and properly without delay given the tools to try to recover as best we can.

Looking forward to hearing from you in this regard as soon as possible. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Mr. xxxx xxxxxx

Crash Victim 2007 -
Insurance Victim – 2014






Cc: undisclosed

Tuesday, June 24, 2014

Appeal process for CPP disability benefits is a 'David and Goliath' battle, Sask. advocate says

Federal appeals tribunal has backlog of 7,000 cases

CBC News Posted: Jun 18, 2014 5:30 AM CT Last Updated: Jun 18, 2014 5:30 AM CT


A Saskatchewan woman who helps people apply for benefits under the Canada Pension Plan says the federal government's appeal process is a "David and Goliath" battle.
'The CPP, or the federal government, has all of the resources and the person making the application — who has the disability — has probably minimal.'- Disability claims advocate Allison Schmidt
Allison Schmidt, a Regina-based disability advocate with about 200 clients, is currently working with Suzanne Fincaryk, who has been waiting nearly two years for her appeal to be heard.
"They really make you run through a lot of hoops, which I can understand because they don't want to make it easy for everybody," Fincaryk told CBC News in a recent interview. "But it's ridiculous. It's gone beyond making it difficult."
Fincaryk lives in Preeceville, Sask., having moved there to be closer to family after suffering a serious heart attack, her second in ten years,  that left her with some cognitive impairment. Unable to work, she applied for disability benefits through the Canada Pension Plan.
allison schmidt
Allison Schmidt, who provides an advocacy service for disability claims, has about 200 clients. (CBC)
When that was refused she appealed, but her case is stalled in federal bureaucracy.
Schmidt says the situation facing Fincaryk, and many other clients, is not fair.
"It's almost like David and Goliath," Schmidt said. "The CPP, or the federal government, has all of the resources and the person making the application — who has the disability — has probably minimal [resources]."
Schmidt says few people have the money to produce medical reports or finance independent assessments to support their claims.

Backlog of 7,000 cases

What's more, according to information Schmidt received by filing an Access to Information request, there is a major backlog facing the Social Security Tribunal, which reviews denied claims.
She learned there are about 7,000 cases waiting to be heard by a tribunal. And, according to Schmidt, the tribunal has only 35 adjudicators assigned to disability files.

No immediate response from Social Security Tribunal

CBC News contacted the tribunal who said they would not be able to respond to an interview request right away.
Schmidt says she has had one client die while waiting on an appeal. Others exhaust all their savings.
"While they're waiting sometimes they have to go on to social services and that is very difficult for them," Schmidt said. "But people can't sustain themselves financially for years at a time. They end up using all their retirement savings or using all their personal savings just to make the bills."
While Fincaryk waits, and hopes, she is getting by with support from her parents and a provincial benefit program.
Schmidt says, in her experience, officials routinely turn down about 60 per cent of cases at every stage — from the initial application through to an appeal before the Social Security Tribunal.
Her advice, for people seeking a disability benefit, is to pay close attention to the initial application to ensure it has all the information the government wants and all the documents needed to support a claim.

source:  http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/appeal-process-for-cpp-disability-benefits-is-a-david-and-goliath-battle-sask-advocate-says-1.2679174

Thousands denied federal disability benefits waiting more than a year for appeals

Thousands of Canadians who have been denied federal disability benefits have been waiting more than a year to have their appeals heard by the federal government’s new Social Security Tribunal, which is clearing just a small fraction of the cases every month.

Allison Schmidt, a Regina-based consultant who helps sick and injured people appeal decisions of the Canada Pension Plan disabilities program, says one of her clients died before her hearing could be scheduled, and many others are declaring bankruptcy.
 
“It’s not a welfare program. These people paid into it,” Ms. Schmidt said of CPP disability benefits. The delays, she said, are a “disgrace.”
The federal Conservative government eliminated last year a board of more than 1,000 part-time referees who heard appeals of employment insurance, CPP and Old Age Security decisions. It was replaced on April 1, 2013, with the Social Security Tribunal, which has fewer than 70 full-time members – 35 of whom have been assigned to the income-security section, which includes CPP and OAS.

The tribunal inherited 7,224 appeals of income-security cases from its predecessor – most of them launched by people who were denied CPP disability benefits. There were also 3,741 new CPP and OAS appeals filed last year. But the tribunal heard just 348 income-security appeals in its first 13 months of operation. So, even though more than 700 cases were settled without a hearing, there are nearly 10,000 still waiting in the queue.

“If they keep going at this rate, and nobody else applies, it’s going to take them nine-and-a-half years to hear all of the current income-security appeals,” said Jinny Sims, NDP critic for employ- ment and social development.

Dominique Forget, the senior director of the tribunal, said adjudicators were hampered last year by a regulation that gave appellants and the government 365 days, starting April 1, 2013, to file documents and give notice that they were ready to proceed . That applied even to appeals that had been launched years earlier, Ms. Forget said.

In the first 12 months, “we didn’t have many cases where the parties told us they were ready to proceed,” she said.

The 365-day deadline on all of the inherited cases has now expired so all of those cases are being handed off to the adjudicators, explained Ms. Forget. She couldn’t say how many cases are being heard every month or predict how fast the tribunal will get through the backlog. But “if we jump in time and we go to April 2015,” she said, “I am sure the picture will look quite different.”

Ms. Schmidt is not optimistic. She said she doesn’t believe 35 people can clear a backlog of nearly 10,000 appeals.

“Some of these files are inches thick,” said Ms. Schmidt. “You’ve got complex medical information to review. Then you’ve got to apply the legislative tenets. Then you’ve got to have a hearing. And then you’ve got to write the decision.”

One of Ms. Schmidt’s clients suffered a stroke several years ago. He also has severe arthritis which makes it impossible to continue working as a welder and is depleting his retirement savings just to survive.

When his claim for CPP disability was rejected, he filed an appeal in July 2012. Ms. Schmidt said she told the tribunal last fall that the man is prepared to proceed with a hearing but has heard nothing.

Rodger Cuzner, the Liberal critic for Employment and Social Development, said the Social Security Tribunal is just “another example of how vulnerable Canadians end up paying for poorly planned and implemented programs. Everyone knew this was going to happen except the government.”

source: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/thousands-awaiting-appeals-before-social-security-tribunal/article19150798/

Freedom Of Information request reveals .......

On February 27, 2014 I requested information under the Freedom of Information Act regarding the Social Security Tribunal appeal statistics.

9027 Income Security Appeals are waiting to be heard (these are CPP appeals)

The SST heard 21 CPP appeals in 2013 and 155 appeals in 2014 in the General Division.

The SST heard 38 CPP appeals in 2013 and 40 appeals in 2014 in the Appeals Division.

As of February 2014 a total of 2,802 appeals were received at the Income Security Division of the SST which includes CPP and OAS appeals.

There are 292 Income Security Appeals waiting to be heard at the Appeal Division of the SST.

67 Appeals were heard in person, 82 appeals were by teleconference, 26 were by videoconference, 3 were by way of question and answers.

There were 592 appeals allowed and 134 appeals dismissed at the General Division (interesting because the SST only heard 176 appeals so most of these were CPP driven). http://www.dcac.ca/blog/?page=1


 Source: http://www.fairassociation.ca/category/news/