Showing posts with label dispute resolution system. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dispute resolution system. Show all posts

Saturday, April 5, 2014

Canadian Insurance News Submission 3 Year Review


 

 

Canada Insurance News

Contact: canadianinsurancenews@gmail.com


Submission Ontario Auto Insurance Three-Year Review



Attention:
Jennifer MacMillan, Senior Policy Consultant, Auto Insurance Policy Unit, FSCO at 3YearReview@fsco.gov.on.ca.




This Open Letter is intended to provide some incite from a victims perspective, and to educate decision makers.
















Submission to the Ontario Auto Insurance Three-Year Review.
By Canadian Insurance News
March 29, 2014






Brief Personal History:


I have a unique perspective to offer in regards to the insurance industry as I have been in the insurance system since a fatal crash that was not my fault back in 2007.
I am a white male, born in Canada with roots going back to 1670. Before the fatal crash in 2007 I was a 3rd generation truck driver. My jobs included hauling almost every produce, and commodity imaginable. I was a professional driver at the top of my profession with a perfect driving record. We proudly display a Canadian flag on our back, and front lawn. My family and I are law abiding members of the community with no criminal records.


Brief History of Crash:

I was coming home from work travelling on a narrow country road I used often. When I was about 60 feet from the crest of a blind hill, suddenly there were two cars travelling towards me, side by side, one car was in my lane. There was no where for me to go !...
The teenage boy was speeding and passing on a blind hill and solid double line. He hit me with his car at over 102km/hr; taking off the front wheel, sending me rolling 8 times, and into a tree. I was trapped upside-down. The airbag went off in the side of my head at a force 2/3's more powerful than that of today s cars. I had used the steering wheel to block my face from the crash. As a consequence my head was placed sideways in the steering wheel at the time of impact, and at the time of air bag detonation. Unfortunately the teenage boy died in the crash as he hit another car and a cement barrier. Remarkably his passenger survived.
Pictures of the 3 car fatal crash are available online at: http://survivingacollision.blogspot.ca/
















Recommendations


You already know of the insurance industry practices, so I shall not reproduce them here in detail and tell you what you already know. I shall not lecture you on the way injured victims are treated following a crash. You can search online for that.


The dark side of the insurance industry world must be quite annoyed by what I would call “heroes for injured victims”. For example, you are probably aware of articles by Alan Shanoff ( http://www.torontosun.com/author/alan-shanoff ) . He has written numerous articles that will give you information on how injured victims are treated by insurers.


Further reading will eventually get you to the Fair Association of Victims for Accident Insurance Reform site at: http://www.fairassociation.ca/ . There you will find yourself in information overload as to the victims movement for Insurance reform. I am a member myself.
If you are an insider in the insurance world and continue to search you will find yourself at
including my Surviving a Collision Blog, and Canadian Insurance News.


On my Surviving a Collision Blog you will find yourself in my CPP Disability benefit application nightmare. I applied for the Disability benefit back in 2008 a year after the fatal crash of 2007. I continue to fight for Disability benefits to date. I think you can imagine what my letters to Service Canada have been like while they continue to deny my family a benefit that I am clearly entitled to. Some of the letters are posted on the Surviving a Collision Blog at http://survivingacollision.blogspot.ca/ for your viewing.


If you require more information on the insurance world you can go to the Canadian Insurance News twitter stream at: https://twitter.com/Cinsurancenews . It was created for the purpose of communicating, and providing information.
I have recently read a sad story about another victim of insurance. His story is similar to mine but one of the differences is that I wont try to hang myself. His story serves as a template for insurance practices that a common, and gives you a glimpse into insurance victims lives. You can read the article at : Life can change in the blink of an eye
or at Canadian Insurance News at:






I used to wonder why something as simple as insurance has gotten so very, very, out of control. Out of control insurers, out of control profits, out of control wordhirlings, out of control pay-for-hire doctors. I have witnessed what they will do to protect their industry full of deceit, it disgusts me.


When I was a trucker I delivered almost everything. I met a lot of people. Most of the people that I met were honest and hard working. Most of the people that I have met in the insurance world are dishonest and uncaring.


I am old enough to remember when there was help for the injured. Doctors even came to your house to treat you back in the 60s. Now the insurance company hires people to abuse an innocent crash victim for profit, and the system is setup to treat a injured crash survivor like they are dishonest, just like the insurance world is.


If it were not for the crash I could go back to my world of Professional Driving, and working with honest and hardworking people. But I am stuck with advocating for insurance reform and my ongoing Social Security Tribunal appeal that they can delay for another year.


Thanks to denials by the insurance system I now have enough contacts and information to share with the world, so that maybe, someone, will fix the insurance system, so that it does not destroy anymore lives, and does what its suppose to do, and what we pay for. Then I can not spend every waking hour thinking about the injustice we live in. Waiting for the money to run out from what little we received from the forced settlement during the FSCO backlog. When justice disappeared because of insurance greed, and look-the-other-way politicians and Doctors.


Our insurer that we paid for decades cut off replacement benefits just prior to mediation. Sound familiar? It should. Its common for the insurer to bleed you dry so you must sign on the dotted line. Huh, justice, where did it go, and how did a product that makes billions of dollars be allowed not to pay the contract of insurance obligations, conveniently, to serve their version of justice.


If you are serious about fixing the insurance system you can start by reducing the fraud that insurers do by sending a message to them. Start by penalizing them for their crimes. If I had my way they would be in jail for what they are doing to innocent injured victims.










Thank you for this opportunity to communicate with you and express my views.
It is unfortunate that you don’t hear from enough crash-insurance-victims. An obvious assumption would be because they can’t. Or they just give up. I understand why, I’m exhausted from trying to receive what should have been automatic, and from being prosecuted for no crime for the last 7 years of my life.
Looking forward to hearing from you or anyone in this regard. Thank you.


Sincerely,
Administrator,
Canadian Insurance News

























Contact: canadianinsurancenews@gmail.com




Friday, December 20, 2013

Reconsideration of the decision to deny Canada Pension Plan Disability


Dear Service Canada:

We have not had any correspondence from you in regards to my reconsideration of August 13, 2013 that you acknowledged in your letter of September 27, 2013.

You have been ignoring my letters to Service Canada as well.

My request for an appeal in my letter of January 21, 2013 was ignored.
There was no Acknowledgement letter of the appeal for my application of May 21, 2008.

If you continue to deny and delay your office will be subject to further public scrutiny’s that are being duplicated and broadcasted to online sources.
Please act according to the regulations and take my case more seriously.
I will take a louder voice if you continue to deny my application for a benefit I am clearly entitled to. What is it going to take to be fairly treated? Will I have to Cc everyone in the house of commons and get on the news!
The most important inquiry to you was four months ago when I asked you to please explain how you can write we realize that you cannot work now.” and at the same time deny my application.

I kindly ask that you respond to my inquiries relating to my application so I can get on with my recovery and have the funds to pay for my medication at $435.05/ month.

Be advised we do not answer the phone because of persistent calls from collection agencies. You will need to leave a message and I will return your call.




Page 1 of 2



Please acknowledge in writing:

  1. Answer my inquiry letters sent to you in 2013
  2. The status of the appeal of my application of May 21, 2008
  3. The latest reconsideration status

Looking forward to hearing from you as soon as possible in this regard.
Thank you.


Sincerely,
xxxx









Page 2 of 2

HCAI Security Breach


The definition for the HCAI has been defined in the 2013 Annual Report of the Office of the Auditor General of Ontario. HCAI is an online database and billing portal to which health-care providers are required to submit billings for injury claims before they are forwarded to insurers for payment.

According to the Privacy statement on the HCAI website ( http://www.hcaiinfo.ca/Media_Public/Privacy.asp ) health Claims for Auto Insurance Processing (HCAIP) is responsible for the operation of the electronic processing system (HCAI) for automobile insurance claims. This system allows health care facilities and insurers to communicate with each other by facilitating the transmission of Ontario claim forms (OCFs).

The HCAI system contains sensitive personal health information. Protecting this information is the job of HCAIP. In order to protect the confidentiality of personally identifiable information (PII) HCAIP commits to maintain appropriate technical and administrative safeguards to protect the data in the HCAI system and any third parties that HCAI contracts to take prompt action in the instance of a privacy breach and protect PII from unauthorized disclosure in paper, electronic or verbal format.

So after reading about the HCAI you would think our personal information is protected, right?

The following document shows that there was in fact a breach of security at the HCAI online database on November 14, 2011.



Clearly the Access to a claimants file in the database by the “Anonymous Web User” logged in to the SecureDox HCAI online database justifies an explanation by its administrators at the HCAI system, and the IBC.

How has an Anonymous user logged into the HCAI online database been allowed to download personal health information?

It doesn't surprise me that our personal health information is at risk by the powers that be.

Insurance Doctors ( wordhirlings) interrogating victims of crashes using their personal computers. Using unsecured email to transfer our personal health information to unsecured servers.

Why is there no legislation to force our personal information be deleted from all the Laptops filled with claimants personal files that wordhirlings bring to the interrogation rooms. And all those emails sent back and forth between the assessment mills and interrogators.

Who monitors our personal health information,  transferred so freely and unsecured, from so many different sources?



Administrator,
Surviving a Collision.

Monday, November 25, 2013

Service Canada Disability Insurance delays denials and tactics


Dear Service Canada General inquiry office:

Thanks for finally responding to my need to send medical evidence to substantiate my claim for disability benefits that I have been kindly asking for since 2008!
My claim for benefits that Service Canada refused to fully investigate and have given bogus reasons for denials.

You remember, that was the one caused by a crash that was not my fault back in 2007.
And has left me with my disabilities. One of those disability’s that causes me to write letters about the broken insurance systems.

Letters that will probably bring an investigation into your office, offices of lawyers, and respected doctors that receive their funding from our misfortune and premiums.

An investigation as to where our money is going is on the table.

Who pays for Service Canada offices that are only open 1 time during the week?
Open for only an hour before lunch and an hour after lunch. Who works those hours?
Are you kidding me? And you don’t answer the phone. At all! Not for days so far that I have tried.
You don’t answer the fax. For days, I tried.
According to you it’s not your job. So. But....I mean...
Who pays to heat the building when no one is there?
Who pays for the lights and hydro, and the fax and phone? Who pays for you?
So, when I call a Service Canada office and know one picks up the phone, turns on the fax machine, looses my doctors report in the postal mail. I think your on strike or some things wrong.
Or maybe you’re just being difficult the way the claim process is purposely meant to be.



Page 1 of 2



THE REASONS I AM WRITING TO YOU ARE AS FOLLOWS:

Thank you for responding to my inquires regarding my application and would like to respond to your voice message letting me know; what’s not your job.

Herein are my general enquires to you:

(1) Is the Service Canada office on Upper James St in Hamilton open?

(2) Again, can you supply me with a contact so I can send even more doctors reports to further substantiate my claim for benefits? A phone number/ fax number would be appreciated for someone in the Disability claims office.
We live in rural Ontario and the Service Canada office is some distance away and not easy for me navigate just to see if it is open, or still exists. Since I have no funds because of your unjust denials and from being injured in a crash it is imperative that you can at the very least provide me with some information. You are the General enquiry office for Disability Insurance.

Please forward this fax letter to whom ever is going to deny my Application for disability benefits next working out of your protective custody office in Chatham.

Looking forward to hearing from as soon as possible in this regard. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Mr. xxxx xxxxxx


Page 2 of 2

Monday, November 18, 2013

Insurance overhaul

Experienced Ontario jurist reviewing dispute resolution system

It’s obvious Ontario’s auto insurance dispute resolution system is in need of an overhaul.

According to personal injury lawyer Darcy Merkur, “the cumbersome arbitration process makes it impossible to quickly and economically arbitrate any day-to-day treatment denials. There’s simply no way to arbitrate a treatment denial and get a timely result and, even if that was possible, the cost of arbitrating would greatly exceed the amount in dispute.”

With approximately 60,000 injuries attributed to motor vehicle accidents each year, how is it possible we generated an average of 30,606 mediation applications per year in the last three fiscal years?

On top of that there were 23,521 auto insurance related lawsuits filed in Ontario courts in 2012.

So it’s good to see the provincial government is trying to tackle the problem.

It has appointed an experienced jurist, the Hon. J. Douglas Cunningham, former Associate Chief Justice of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, to conduct the review of Ontario’s auto insurance dispute resolution system.

Cunningham delivered his interim report last month. His final report is due in February.

The interim report states the obvious in that “it takes too long to resolve disputes.” Cunningham understands obtaining funding to pay for treatment has become a “challenge” while “(c)laimants’ lives can be put on hold for years waiting resolution of their claims.” He is clearly sympathetic to the plight of accident victims when he warns insurance companies that “(d)isputes and settlements need to be focused on getting claimants timely access to necessary treatment and assessments.” Cunningham blames both insurance companies and claimants’ lawyers for some of the delays.

Lawyers are often unable to commit to pre-arbitration sessions or hearing dates until “many months in the future” due to their busy schedules.

Some adjusters are inexperienced, have high caseloads and should do more to resolve disputes earlier.

Insurers act in a counter-productive manner when they attempt to close files with lump sum payments, rather than focus on timely access to treatment and assessments.

Cunningham has proposed a possible solution, establishing a process which would conclude within six months from start to finish.

As he describes it: “Cases would follow a different stream based on the benefits in dispute and the complexity of the issues involved. Ensuring access to timely and necessary treatment would be a first principle.” This would go a long way to improve the status quo but Cunningham must first examine why there are so many treatment/benefit denials.

Are claimants attempting to abuse the system by seeking unnecessary treatments or accessing benefits to which they are not entitled, or are insurers systemically denying treatment and benefits?

Andrew Murray, former president of the Ontario Trial Lawyers Association, believes the dispute resolution system “suffers from systemic abuse by insurers, which invoke a decidedly adversarial approach to the adjudication of accident benefits, best described as ‘deny, delay, deceive’.” Many insurer-appointed experts undertake so-called independent medical examinations and provide opinions used to deny claims. To what extent do these opinions serve to delay the just resolution of claims?

Wouldn’t fair, impartial assessments result in speedier resolution?

I have written many columns chronicling the unfair opinions of many of the insurers’ so-called experts.

Some are clearly unqualified or under qualified to provide the opinions they generate.

Some specialize in providing opinions to insurers rather than practicing medicine. That is, they earn a significant portion of their income peddling opinions to insurers.

“Experts” of this ilk cannot be expected to provide fair assessments.

Whether consciously or subconsciously, they provide the opinions desired by their paymasters.

FAIR (Fair Association of Victims for Accident Insurance Reform), a not-for-profit organization of motor vehicle accident victims who have struggled with Ontario’s existing auto insurance system, has a website that chronicles the activities of many of these insurance industry “experts”, who have made life miserable for accident claimants.

Fixing Ontario’s auto insurance dispute resolution system will require more than mere tinkering.

Cunningham’s interim report bodes well for some real solutions.

Source: http://www.torontosun.com/2013/11/15/insurance-overhaul 

Thursday, November 14, 2013

FSCO backlog- Class Action Lawsuit


Open letter to FSCO:

Honourable J. Douglas Cunningham, former Associate Chief Justice of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

Senior Manager, Insurance Policy Unit
Industrial and Financial Policy Branch
Ministry of Finance
95 Grosvenor Street, 4th Floor
Toronto, Ontario M7A 1Z1


Dear FSCO:

According to the Ontario Automobile Insurance Dispute Resolution System Review Interim report,  beginning in 2007 FSCO began to experience a dramatic increase in Applications for Mediation.
 In 2006 07, FSCO received 13,053 new applications and in 201112, received 35,727 applications a 174 per cent increase.
As a result, FSCO was not able to meet the legislated 60- day time line for mediation and a backlog of files awaiting assignment to a mediator developed.
At the end of December 2011, there was a backlog of approximately 30,700 files,
FSCO was receiving an average of 2,949 new Applications for Mediation every month and claimants were waiting in excess of 11 months for mediation.

The FSCO backlog created forced settlements.
Victims of insurance had no choice but to sign forced settlements because Insurance Companies cut benefits off just before settlement.
When victims were told that mediation could take up to or more than a year to get heard. We had no choice. With no income, no justice, disabled, what can you do, we got screwed.

By purposely creating this backlog, these forced settlements were illegal, immoral, and insurance companies profited greatly by them.

I suggest that all the victims of these forced settlements be compensated.
Why not a class action lawsuit in this regard?

No names have been posted on this blog in accordance to the forced settlement agreement. That’s why you don’t hear from the victims of insurance.

Sincerely,
Administrator,

Sunday, May 27, 2012

Tell Queen’s Park there’s plenty wrong with car insurance

Disclaimer: The names have been removed in the following letter to comply with legal demands.



May 27, 2012

Via Facsimile 613-996-1626

Via Letter Mail
Clerk of the Committee,
Room 1405, Whitney Block,
Queen’s Park, Toronto, Ontario M7A 1A2.

Re: Public Hearings on Car Insurance Industry Practices


Dear Clerk of the Committee:

I thank you for this opportunity to express my views on car insurance industry practices. I regret not being able to come there in person as the trip would be too painful, and can not afford the gas because my Insurer has unjustly stopped paying accident benefits.

Having been a victim of a fatal crash in 2007, I can tell you first hand my dealings with the current Insurance System.

Brief Personal History

I am a xx year old white male, born in Canada with roots going back to 1670. Before the fatal crash I was a 3rd generation truck driver. My jobs included hauling almost every produce and commodity imaginable. I am a professional driver with a perfect driving record. We proudly display a Canadian flag on our back and front lawn. We have two children. Both my wife and I are law abiding members of the community with no criminal records.

Brief History of Crash

I was coming home from work travelling on a narrow country road I used often. When I was about 60 feet from the crest of a blind hill, suddenly there were two cars travelling towards me, side by side, one car was in my lane. There was no where for me to go !...
The teenage boy was speeding and passing on a blind hill and solid double line. He hit me with his car at 102km/hr; taking off the front wheel, sending me rolling 8 times, and into a tree.
I was trapped upside-down. The airbag went off in the side of my head at a force 2/3's more powerful than that of today s cars. I had used the steering wheel to block my face from the crash. As a consequence my head was placed sideways in the steering wheel at the time of impact, and at the time of air bag detonation. Unfortunately the teenage boy died in the crash as he hit another car and a cement barrier.

Page 1 of 6



Findings and Recommendations – Public Hearings on Car Insurance Industry Practices

Our adjuster Mr. xx of xx Insurance has rejected claims of treating physicians, without obtaining a medical opinion. My Adjusters have denied, delayed my legitimate accident benefits off and on over the last 5 years. They began paying accident benefits after a 5 month delay.
Then suddenly before Mediation they cut off my accident benefits in an effort to make me settle in favour of the insurer.

Mediation has taken 5 years in my case. Our adjuster Mr. xx of xx Insurance tactics of sending me excessive distances to insurer interrogations has created a delay. He also mandated an insurer’s examination with a doctor with an obvious conflict of interest  that he new existed, creating further delay. He also mandated on two separate occasions interrogations and the doors were locked creating again an even further delay.

Insurance Companies owe policy holders  fiduciary duties, including the duty to act in good faith.
Our insurer has created an adversarial relationship, which has created great mental distress.
My Insurer has never given the benefit of the doubt when medical reports conflicted in the face of clear medical evidence.

According to a survey by the Alliance of Community Medical & Rehabilitation Providers 42% of all requests for treatment are now being rejected by insurers. The purpose of motor vehicle liability policies is to protect people from financial and emotional stress and insecurity. The main rationale for no fault car insurance accident benefits is that we want people injured in car accidents, regardless of who is at fault, to have quick access to medical and rehabilitation benefits not covered by OHIP. The practice of insurance companies denying requests for treatment has corrupted that philosophy and creates a slow torture to its victims.

The Ontario Auditor Generals report said about 50% of all claims result in mediation requests. With an estimated 36,000 applications for mediation being launched in the current fiscal year, the backlog isn’t likely to decrease. What is a crash victim facing a denial of benefits supposed to do? Forcing injured people to wait a year for non-binding mediation before they can seek a remedy through the courts encourages insurers to deny claims. Mediation is supposed to be fast and inexpensive.

When you buy insurance, you depend on that, thinking insurance is going to help you out if you ever have life-altering injuries. But in reality you have to fight for everything, every step of the way.” They want their money but when roles are reversed, they’ll do anything not to pay.”

In examining the increasing cost of claims, shouldn’t we be examining the increase in costs attributable to defence or insurer medicals, adjuster’s fees and legal fees paid to insurers defence lawyers?
An examination of the insurance industry needs to take place to uncover excessive payments to medical professionals treating accident victims, and how those payments are being declared by the industry.
I have found examples of fraud in the Ontario automobile insurance industry.

Page 2 of 6



We can’t leave the job of making medical determinations to adjusters or even their financially conflicted experts to writing accurate insurer medical reports, with the doctors writing only a small portion.  I have read how the facts have been twisted by assessment mills. Our insurers retained preferred, wordhirelings have been allowed to write whatever they want in there reports, even if it’s not true.

The Insurance system has allowed my personal information to be accessed at the HCAI anonymously.  Wordhirlings working my case have shared all our personal information loosely threw many unsecured channels. I will be requesting an investigation further into this matter; there is obviously a bug in the software and very lenient rules for sending information. No one should be logged-in anonymously accessing my personal information from the Secure Dox web site. Obviously more testing should have gone on before the site was opened for business only a short time ago. They also send emails threw unsecured channels and put personal information in the subject lines that are not encrypted. I feel that the public would react negatively much like I do, when you find out that your medical files are at risk.

Who is going to stop them? They should be held accountable. They should read their own code of ethics. The state of the insurance industry isn’t an election issue. It should be. I feel the Insurance Industry as it stands today is contributing to the general meltdown of society. Insurance Companies hold too much power over the Medical Community. They make misleading allegations, manipulate, and provide false representation of a matter of fact. They report about Scores, and devise graphs with numbers, create paper trails, and make endless non-scientific claims that have little or no evidence to substantiate them. They include and rely on colleagues reports as to be true, and include their Reports, in theirs, over and over again, creating a repetitious paper trail and inducing others in reliance upon them.

To allow a Doctor to run loose to write bias reports to satisfy the agenda of the Insurance Company is criminal and for their own gain only exploits a crash victim further. It’s time for car insurance companies to open their books. Let’s not take our eye off what matters, insurance is supposed to be there for deserving policyholders. While your committee doesn’t have the power to implement changes, it can make recommendations to exam abusive practices by the insurance industry, and we kindly ask that you do so and bring this urgent problem to the attention of the Legislature.

I face a $30,000 deductible and must also satisfy a stringent threshold to recover any award.
We need to examine insurance industry practices to ensure policyholders are getting fair treatment.
The evidence is clear there is a breach of the duty, good faith and fair dealing. Crash victims should not get further victimized by there own Insurance company. We paid insurance premiums for 30 years!
No accidents, no claims, professional driver, and perfect driving records.


Page 3 of 6



Currently I am xx years old, disabled, no job, and no insurance replacement benefits.
I have constant neck pain 100% of the time and constant pain tuning my head that accompanies clicking, cracking, grinding, in my neck 100% of the time. It hurts just to brush my teeth.
I have a sharp pain that originates in the back of my head/neck and radiates into my upper back that feels like pinched nerve spasms. Another sharp electrical type shock radiates into my left shoulder into my left arm and hand. I have a constant high pitch ringing in my left ear from when the air bag went off in the side of my head. My headaches sometimes last for days. I have back pain, and a nerve in my back that is causing a nerve in my toe making it painful to walk. I grind my teeth all night thinking about the insurance and finances which in turn has given me jaw pain and further sleep disruption. I have been bed ridden on many occasions. I’m sure I will be in a ripe mood by the time I get a meeting with a FSCO arbitrator in about a year.

Thank you for this opportunity to submit my findings. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you should have any questions, comments, or wish to view evidence of my claims.  Looking forward to hearing from an advocate as soon as possible in this regard. Thank you, drive careful, and remember, you only think you have insurance if someone hits you.


Sincerely,
Mr. xx
xx xx Rd xx,
xx Ontario, xx








Cc: Mr. xx Law Office
Cc: Mr. xx Law Office
Cc: CEO – xx Insurance
Cc: Dr. xx – Family Physician


Next mailing:
Cc: xx, MPP – Queenspark
Cc: xx, MPP -Queenspark
Cc: xx, Mediator – xx Mediations
Cc: xx, Clinical Manager – xx Management Inc.
Cc: xx - xx Management Inc.

Page 4 of 6


Next mailing:

Cc: Mr. xx, Lawyer, Journalist – xx
Cc: Letter to the editor - xx Newspaper
Cc: Letter to the editor - xx Newspaper
Cc: Letter to the editor - xx Newspaper
Cc: Letter to the editor - xx Newspaper
Cc: Letter to the editor - xx Newspaper
Cc: Letter to the editor - xx Newspaper
Cc: xx - xx Psychologists
Cc: xx – xx Psychologists
Cc: Dr. xx – xx Psychologists
Cc: Ms. xx – xx
Cc: xx – xx Rehabilitation
Cc: xx – xx Rehabilitation
Cc: Mr. xx - xx Physiotherapy Clinic
Cc: Mr. xx - xx Physiotherapy Clinic
Cc: Chief Privacy Officer - HCAI Processing
Cc: xx, Broker - xx Insurance Brokers
Cc: Mr. xx – Morrison Insurance Brokers
Cc: xx, Privacy Commissioner – Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
Cc: Dr. xx, Associate Professor, McMaster University
Cc: Mr. xx - xx Consulting
Cc: xx, Investigator – The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario
Cc: Financial Services Commission of Ontario
Cc: xx, Lawyer for the Defence (Insurer) -  xx
Cc: Dr. xx
Cc: Dr. xx
Cc: xx, Vocational Evaluator – xx Inc.
Cc: xx – xx & Associates
Cc: Dr. xx
Cc: Mrs. xx – xx Insurance
Cc: Dr. xx
Cc: xx, Claims Examiner – xx
Cc: xx, Case Manager – The xx Company
Cc: xx, Head xx Insurance Operations – The xx Company
Cc: Mr. xx, Occupational Therapist- xx
Cc: xx, Occupational Therapist- xx
Cc: xx - xx Clinic
Cc: Dr. xx
Cc: xx, Occupational Therapist
Cc: Dr. xx, Orthopaedic Surgeon
 

Page 5 of 6


Next mailing

Cc: xx – xx Minister of Canada
Cc: Members of Parliament
Cc: General Media sources
Cc: Online Media sources
Cc: Online Forums and Blogs
Cc: Online Social Networks


Page 6 of 6